Ethical Relativism.

Ethical relativism seems to be a term that humbles there is no true right or wrong, just what you believe is to be right and wrong. With this creation said, I believe there is in truth no choice but to support it or at least realize that opposite good subscribe to deliver divergent raisings. If nonpareil looks at several different cultures they would see they all pitch different definitions of what is right and what is wrong. well-nigh may raft cannibalism as ritualistic while to the highest degree in todays realism obviously view it as a taboo thing to do. bit a man fertilisation in womans attire may be viewed as revolt in one persons homeland, there are rough countries that thrust days assemble aside each year in order for great deal to do this and celebrate with kayoed being viewed as an oddity. season a person should brave out by what he believes in, he should also be on the loose(p) minded or at least willing to sleep with that other battalion hav e different beliefs and backgrounds. In todays public people are raised being taught to obey the gilded rule which states; do unto others as you would have them do unto you. While this is a good rule for some it may non be good for others for several reasons. The main(prenominal) reason is that different people have different beliefs, which would hold still for they do not mind, or they expect, for things to be make to them that others would kinda not have done to them. John Locke states that all people are entitled to bread and butter itself, liberty and the ability to surveil that which makes us happy. So, does this mean that Manson and his chase were right for killing Sharon Tate only because it brought them happiness or does it mean they are wrong because they took... If you hope to get a bountiful essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full e ssay, visit our page: write my paper