Plato And Augustin Essay

1) WHAT IS PLATOS ATTITUDE TOWARD THE BODY? (300 Words)http//classics.mit.edu/Plato/symposium.html In Platos work SYMPOSIUM there is much subtext to be found under the surface of what seems like a marginally focused conversation among several individuals. What is unique about this work is that inside the random bits of dialogue put forth there is a genuine unique cohesion that presents it self. That cohesion is present in the bureau in which the random gives way to the logical and nothing is more evident of this than what is found within Platos concept of the body. The body, at first, refers to the physical appearance of an individual. This physical appearance provides the basis for attraction for a loved iodine. However, this attraction is very matted and declarative mood of a surface level understanding of the individual. However, physical attraction is a strong emotion and maculation this attraction is devoid of depth it does give way to quantity. In other words, when physic al attraction is all that matters to an individual thence happiness derives from simply associating with more and more attractive bodies. This is about as vapid of a series of tender-hearted births as one could possibly involve oneself. It also bases relationships on errant randomness as an individual simply bounces from one attractive person to the other. Where Plato does redeem the image of the body is in the way he presents it as a conduit to deeper meaning. In other words, while there is a certain randomness and banality to chasing beauty this chase can lead one to a partner who offers far more than only what the body offers. Looks then become the conduit to true love, intellectual stimulation or a combination of both. This way the randomness found in the search for the best body merely acts as a transitory function in the sense that it eventually leads to the cohesiveness of a deep relationship. Well, hopefully anyway.2) HOW DOES AUGUSTINE VIEW HUMAN NATURE? (300 WORDS)http/ /www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf102.iv.XII.1.html The relationship between immortal and Gods subordinates has been debated for numerous years. Much of this debate derives from the fact that there has never been a definitive statement on what God truly intended from those whom God created. As such, much has been left to speculation and interpretation. Regarding human nature, St. Augustine examines the flaws inherent with such nature and links these flaws with fluctuations inherent with reason. To a peachy degree, Augustine notes that it is human nature to be flawed and much of this derives from reason. Augustine is clear to point out that there are a number of factors which separate humans from lesser beings and that while all things created from God are good humans have the capacity to deviate from natural order due to reason and passion. Hence, they can be prone to errors in judgment whereas lesser animals are not. Hence, human nature has the capacity for improvement but it also h as the capacity to great harm to the self or others. Augustine points out that often people will use God as a crutch. That is, because it is human nature to draw value from the external many will see themselves as weak and cleave to God because it is God that gives them strength, God that gives them reason, etc. This, however, diminishes the value of the human as the reliance of the self is gone. So, while this cleaving to God may have noble intentions (seek advice from the higher power) it is actually a sign of weakness and a rejection of the free will God has provided. Hence, it represents another smell of the flawed nature of humanity. Granted, while Augustine views human nature as a flawed entity he does equate flawed with bad. Flawed simply is the state of human nature and is neither good nor bad. It is simply the natural order of things.