The Industrial Giant Known as America

M whatsoever portions led to America having a tremendous overturn in industry. The five points that made the intimately impact were technology, mass distri entirelyion and production, education, railroads, management reports and structure, and immigrant labor. These five points not only improved the existing industry, but they revolutionized how the American industry would be run for the next generation. As with any change in an existing system, there were a few problems, the primary(prenominal) problems where with workers so management just replaced them with cable cars.Many community werent take in to make the adjustment from sm only town arming to big urban center living but the benefits far out-weighed any unusual situations, so the citizenry and the nation when a enormous with it. In the 1850s and on, near Americans were wondering slightly the benefit of a society dominated by cities, factories, and masses of mesh earners. Along with cities and factories, pollution , and unhygienic situations was rising as well. Industrializing of the nation was wanted by many people but on the other hand, many people did not want to see the nation industrialize.The United States, at this point, more often than not an agricultural society, nd most of the people lived on farms or in small towns, and had lots of open space to live in. These caused a slow up of the United States transforming into a industrial nation. Depression set and there was turmoil in the work force. This began to change in the 1870s when the Populist society gained a strong foothold. In 1897, the economic depression finally came to an end. In 1910, the United States firming planted itself as the worlds Probably the most important feature aiding the nations growth was technology.Two major inventions during this period were the invention of the gasoline- powerfulnessed, nternal combustion locomotive engine and harnessing of electric power. Harnessing electrical power opened many doors f or technological advancements. The cheaper and cleaner electrical power allowed for perennial working days and easier working day for the laborers. Metal-working went right hand in hand with electric generators and related equipment. In 1878 the first gas engine was patented. This was responsible for the first production of the Model-T, the nations first automobile made by Henry Ford.Millions of people bought the Model-T, and that in turn called for millions of pounds of steel ,glass, rubber, etroleum, and other materials practicable materials to be produced. This called for millions of jobs in coal and iron-ore mining, oil refinery, steel making, rubber manufacturing, machine tooling, and service stations. These and many other jobs led to corporations and new jobs Management of parentage is the next issue. The number of managers grew, as elaborate corporate hierarchies deformed twain the tasks and status of individual managers.Day to day operations were replaced by mettle mana gers, who oversaw a single department in corporate headquarters. This rapid blowup within corporate managerial ranks created a new middle soma. They were doglike to their employers, but were at odds with both the blue-color workers, and with the older middle class of shopkeepers. Also small businessmen, an independent craftsmen were not too happy with the idea of this excessively. With all of this happening, there was a growing emergency to ship goods, which in turn led to a major need for the railroads. The next factor that helped the industrial growth was immigrant labor.Immigrant labor constituted about 70% of all the labor in the twentieth century. Immigrants strengthened the nations tunnels and railroads , mine iron ore, coal and other minerals. They stoked the hot steel furnaces on the trains and in steel factories also. In the railroad industry was where the immigrants really made their mark. Immigrants worked long hours because really they were all of the former(a) wor k force so they built much of the early railroad and were in on most of its matinence. national markets were growing at such a enormous rate, manufacturers had to improve on mass-production.To speed up production, they needed to lower the cost of ll shipped items. This often meant that most workers were replaced by machines. Aside from an occasional matinence the machines worked cheaply. Also, manufacturers often found that distribution systems need to be revamped. This led to specialized sale forces, and on-going customer service. Duke who started a regional gross revenue offices, made it so that his saleman could keep in touch with topical anesthetic retailers. This helped manufacturers tap into what the public wanted in turn keeping sales high. Duke also started national advertising which was a huge success.Duke was the father of advertisers of early industry. Many factors helped contribute to the growth of the nations industry. The five accentuate are the main factors that co ntributed the most to improvements in the industry. The improvements not only changed not only in increased revenue, but also in the authority people lived their daily lives. The adjustment from small town, rural living and horticulture to big city living and urbanization led to some counterpoint of ideas among early workers. Other conflict of interest in business also surfaced as everyone wanted the get there hand in the money.

Core Business Skills

1. 0 INTRODUCTION This particular assignments shoot is to discuss the application of the strategic circumspection process in a retail exertion. I have chosen Starbucks umber hit as my nutrient and potable labor to research on, and to thoroughly explain the strategic management process implied by them. Starbucks hot chocolate tree Comp whatsoever was founded by English teacher Jerry Baldwin, history teacher Zev Siegl, and writer Gordon Bowker back in year 1971 Seattle, Washington. Starbucks cocoa Company is know as the worlds lead story burnt umber retailer, roaster and last nonwithstanding not least grunge of specialty deep brown.Apart from providing only deep brown, Starbucks burnt umber in addition cater light snacks like sandwiches, delicious pastries, healthy salads and etc. Since Starbucks Coffee is the worlds leading brand in coffee, they serve up to 35 meg customers from all over the world weekly. Beca wasting disease of their great re foundation, they ha ve successfully exposed up to 17,000 stores worldwide. The alliances mission statement is to inspire and nurture military man spirit. Firstly, Starbucks Coffee snapsing to provide a great work environment to their members so that they atomic number 18 treated with respect and dignity.Secondly, Starbucks Coffee as well believes that conducting business ethically is the principal(prenominal) key to be successful in a business. As a worldwide and leading-brand company, Starbucks Coffee insists strongly on principal(prenominal)taining a culture where diversities atomic number 18 well valued and respected. These diversities include inclusion human connection and engagement, lawfulness fairness and justice, accessibility ease of use and barrier free so that employees with various background atomic number 18 fairly treated and respected to ensure a cheery and enjoyable workplace (www. starbucks. com 2011). . 0 strategical depth psychology 2. 1 Internal Analysis 2. 1. 1 Str ength One of the main faculty possesses by Starbucks Coffee is the strong brand image they have. In foothold of the coffee fabrication, they be considered to be roughly re ordinateable comp atomic number 18d to Coffee Beans, Gloria Jeans, and early(a) competitors among the industry. Starbucks Coffee manage to prove themselves as a highly resorted brand by getting rated as the top 100 most seeked afterwards brand. Apart from having a high brand value, Starbucks Coffee has managed to globalise their indicate food marketplace in to all parts of the world.This opens up the opportunity for Starbucks themselves to control the unknown market as well. 2. 1. 2 Weaknesses No matter what industry a firm is in, they go away face certain weaknesses that they have to of all time try to improve on. As for Starbucks Coffee, superstar of their main weaknesses is the product price. In some countries, Starbucks Coffee is considered as a premium product where the prices of their produ cts are higher compared to other coffee shops (Lee S, 2007). Another weakness that Starbucks Coffee has is that they are too focused in their domestic market which is the United express of America.This result lead Starbucks Coffee into a vulnerable position where it is trying for them to predict unforeseen changes in the industrys market at other countries. 2. 2 Stakeholders in Starbucks Coffee Stakeholders in Starbucks Coffee includes all the workers which are known as partners. This is because Starbucks Coffee wants to create an environment where all their employees would feel at ease and relaxed (Kembell B, 2002). The second stakeholders for Starbucks Coffee Company would be their highly valued customers. These customers revivify an fundamental role in Starbucks Coffee because they are the ones who visit the coffeehouse almost e rattlingday.In order to feel connected to Starbucks Coffee, customers poop easily larn and engaged with the employees and products of Starbucks anytime, anywhere (Hanft A, 2005). The other crucial stakeholder in Starbucks Coffee entrust be their coffee farmers. These coffee farmers are actually the backbone to Starbucks Coffee because Starbucks rely mainly on coffee products. In order to uphold the social and economic well- creation of their coffee farmers, they have decided to turn over a premium price for high gauge coffee beans from them (Robertson H, 2006). 2. 3 Core CompetenciesAs we all know, core competencies in any industry is actually their comparative advantage. As for Starbucks Coffee, one of their core competency is human resource. Firstly, Starbucks Coffee is a company that values their employees greatly. Starbucks shows their appreciation to their employees by bountiful them the opportunity to receive full healthcare benefits, stock options/discounted stock acquire plans (Weber G, 2005). Starbucks Coffees tangible resources al economic crisis for be their high-quality coffee beans called the Narino Supre mo Beans. The Narino Supremo Beans have the highest quality and is the largest bean in Columbia (www. melita. om, 2011). In a y fall outhful report, it is said that the president of the Columbias National Federation of Coffee Growers have sustain the purchase of 6 to 7 percent of Starbucks shares (Castaneda S, 2009). This shows that Starbucks Coffee has sole self-possession over the high quality beans which is an advantage for them. Starbucks Coffee has a nice reputation and is well accepted finishedout the world. This reflects on their intangible resources to tempt customers. Having a good brand name, friendly employees and high quality coffee beans are the main traits possessed by Starbucks Coffee. 2. 4. 0 External Analysis 2. 4. 1 OpportunitiesStarbucks has of all time use their opportunities to expand their business in to a whole new take aim. Firstly, Starbucks has created an opportunity for themselves to expand their brand name to foreign countries. It is reported that Starbucks are provision to open up to 15,000 new stores crosswise the world in the years to come (Datamonitor, 2005). Apart from that, Starbucks technological advancements has accustomed them a good opportunity to conveniently distribute products to customers by the internet. Starbucks has also equipped all their lounges with WiFi services to accommodate their valued-customers to boot (Elgan M, 2008). . 4. 2 Threats One of the menaces that depart be faced by Starbucks coffee is the price fluctuation of diary and coffee products. The price of theese products lot also be hazarded by the income levels of customers in upcoming or developing outlandish as goods over in that location are highly inflated (Pinkasovitch A, 2011). In e actually industry that we are in, there will always be competitors trying to penetrate the market . Competitors for Starbucks Coffee would be other coffehouses that sells coffee. Coffeebean, San Francisco Coffee, and Gloria Jeans are film competitors for Starbucks. 2. 5 PEST Analysis 2. 5. 1 Political figureOne of the policy-making factors that posses as a major(ip) issue for Starbucks is the unstability of political issues that would directly affect the growth rate of Starbucks Coffee. From a recent report, it says that up to five Arab states have decided to boycott American goods with their primary target being Starbucks Coffee shops (Antievil, 2008) 2. 5. 2 frugal Factor Apart from that, Economic factor is also a very important matter to purport into when executing a strategic compendium. One of the economical problems that affected Starbucks was the quoin in Switzerland, Japan and Germany in the early 2000s.In a more recent report, the Company had revealed a 70% drop in their quarterly wage to only $64. 3m. Apart from that, they are also planning to close voltaic pile up to 300 stores (Clark A, 2009). 2. 5. 3 Social Factor Starbucks has always place on their social issues and responsibilities. Starbucks always part icipated in upholding the importance of the environment. A feed by Starbucks to create a partnership with the Conservation International, mainly to put their attention on environmental protection such as fade reduction and energy and water saving programs (David, 2009).A move like this proves that Starbucks are cautious about the social responsibilities. 2. 5. 4 Technology In terms of technology, Starbucks has always been up to date. All of Starbucks outlets are fitted with Wi-Fi services. Another move to be technologically involved will be the creation of music CDs that will suit the specific moods of customers. They are available for purchase at any Starbucks outlet (Lodi K, 2006). 2. 5 Porters Five Forces Framework The Porters Five Forces framework is utilize to go in to a more in depth analysis of an industry.The five forces usually includes industry competitors, new entrants, suppliers, customers, and utility(a)s. In all industries, companies will have to face strong compet itors in order to dominate the markets. For Starbucks, their main rivalries would be Coffee Bean, San Francisco Coffee, and other coffee lounges that falls into Starbucks category. They do not only compete domestically, but also internationally. Sometimes, rivalry from other industries can also be a threat. For example, McDonalds could pose as a threat to Starbucks because they are a fast-food chain yet they unbosom provide coffee in their menu.They could be one of the strongest competitors for Starbucks to face (Gregory S, 2009). Another forces that Starbucks faces is the emergence of substitute products. Because Starbucks is a premium product, therefore their prouct prices are usually very high. During a recession, there is a high possibility that customers from Starbucks look for a substition to pooh-pooh down their expenditure. Products like Coca-cola or Pepsi-cola could be one of the substitues for high quality coffee beans. However there is a big difference in the taste and smell when it is being consumed. Therefore the main substitute for Starbucks will be basic coffee.This will be a threat to Starbucks because they are an organisation that caters to high-income earners. One other factor that might affect an industry will be the customers buying power. However, this depends on the organisation itself. If they are an personable organisation then the bargaining power of buyers will be low and poses no threat to the company. For Starbucks, the bargaining power of its buyers are low. Althought prices of Starbucks are high, customers still buy it because of its differentiated and outstanding products. The other forces that will directly affect an industry is the suppliers bargaining power.The suppliers bargaining power will rise when there is a rise in demand of the product that they supply. Starbucks could be facing this threat because they rely on central american to produce the coffee traded. Since there are more demand in high-quality beans, main sup pliers will naturally have a stronger bargaining power. An over-crowded market will offend the coffee suppliers bargaining power. There are no substitute products for the coffee beans Starbucks must buy. This is a potential threat to the company, (Hanft A, 2005). 3. 0 dodging grammatical construction 3. 1 BusinessLevel StrategyFor all the industries, they have to chose a business outline that can successfully dominate the market. The formulation of this scheme is very crucial in a busines because it helps to find customers. One of the tools that can be used to ponder an industrys business level strategies is the porters generic strategies. Starbucks uses the focused differentiated outline derived by Michael Porter to run their business. As we all know, Starbucks is known as a food and beverage company. But to be specific, Starbucks is a food and beverage company that focuses on coffee brewing.They are well known for their high-quality beans and comfortable lounges. Starbucks chooses a segment to market their products to. This includes coffee fanatics and people who are tone for a place to relax. However, Starbucks caters their products to mostly high-income earners because their products are expensive. This shows that the focused differentiation strategy is used to seek their competitive advantage in the market through uniqueness of their products (Campling J, 2007). The advantage of Starbucks focus on a single market can give them the chance to handle all managerial, financial, technological, and capabilities in one business.Starbucks has always been trying to come out with more creative and advanced(a) products to be differentiated among their competitors. This has certainly made them the biggest winner in the coffee based industry (Guarriello T, 2008). Although the prices are high in Starbucks, they are very differentiated in terms of the coffee beans they use and they way the serve. This shows that the focus differentiation startegy that Starbuck s uses is an effective way to attract customers since they are the world leading brand in its industry. Another way to formulate a business-level strategy in an industry is to apply the product life cycle method.The offshoot stage of a product life cycle is introduction, followed by growth, maturity, and even out (Campling J, 2007). 3. 2 Corporate-level Strategy The somatic strategies are used by industries to direct their organisations towards a sustainable competitive advantage (Campling J, 2007). The main purpose for the use of this strategy is to set a target and control resources allocation for an enterprise. The scratch approach to formulate a corporate strategy is the portfolio planning approach. The portfolio planning approach are designed to help managers to decide on invest scare organisational resources among competing business opportunity.This straregy is very useful for multibusiness enterprises like Starbucks. Growth strategy can be used as one of the corporate le vel strategy to effectively expand and increase the size of a companys operations, through store expansion and global market penetration. In order for Starbucks to successfully expand their stores, it is required for them to have full concentration on their products (Campling J, 2007). Starbucks has been very aggressive in store expansion, this includes them opening up to a xii of stores in China in year 2007 (Yan Z, 2008).In addition to that, Starbucks has also put their main focus on diversifying their growth to other products. 4. 0 Strategy Implementation 4. 1 Organisation Structure An enterprises organisation structure is the form of childbed and reporting relationships that allows the company to control its lines of authority and communication at the same time allocating rights and duties. There are three types of organisational structures, the divisional structure, matrix organisation and hybrid structure. Starbucks has adopted the matrix organisation structure to focus on .All the employees in this firm would report to both a functional and divisional manager and lastly to a project manager. miserys of strategic planning happens most of the time. The most common strategic planning failures are failures of substance and failures of process. Failure of substance happens because there is inadequate attention being paid to major strategic planning elements. Failures of process will be caused by unfortunate handling of strategy implentation like lack of participation error and refinement displacement error. Therefore, the organisational structure in a company is very important to avoid unwanted uprising problems. . 2 Corporate Governance The corporate governace is the system of control and performance monitoring of top management (Campling J, 2007). This task is usually done by the boards of directors, and other major stakeholder in the company. For Starbucks Coffee, they presently have 9 directors including the CEO of Starbucks Howard Schultz. These directors of Starbucks are responsible for ensuring goals and objectives in the company are met. The directors are well aware of their responsibility to provide a stable managing process so that the companys goalds are met (www. starbucks. com). 4. Strategic Leadership Strategic management is a leadinghip responsibility. Whereas strategic leadership is the capability to effect others with the ever-changing strategies in the market. Michael Porter says that the strategic leader of an enterprise has to be the CEO of an organisation (Campling J, 2007). One of the most crucial task for a strategic leader is to be a guardian of trade-offs. Countless loading and disipline has to be put in by a strategic leader in order for the business the be successful. Another trait that a strategic leader must posses is the ability to create a brain of urgency.By having a sense of urgency, the strategic leader is able to give out a strong message to its organisation and their members that the need for consistent improvementwill always persist. A strategic-chief will also have to ensure that everyone related to the organistion understands the strategy that they are using. Leaders in an organisations will have to keep their members updated with their a la mode(p) business strategy. Furthermore, the task of a strategic leader also includes being a teacher and a good communicator. 5. 0 Conclusion 5. 1 Importance of Strategic Management In conclusion, strategic management involves many processes.This includes identifying the mision, objectives and strategies of an industry. Strategic management is very important for a business as it is used to derive the main strategy for your business. With good strategic manangement skills, leaders are able to adopt to the sudden change in the market and they can also prepare themselves to the different needs and wants of their customers. An industry with a good strategy will always be succesful. Strategic management can also be applied to anal yse the internal and orthogonal environment of an industry which can give leaders of an industry a better understanding of the market.

Great Expectations and April Raintree Essay

A key theme in considerable Expectations and April Raintree is the growth and change of the characters towards their standance of social coterie. This will be prove by take non hopeing himself in the let down furcate and April not accepting herself in the innate single out. Then, there will be cogent evidence of how Pip and April attempted to change their social class. Finally the proof of how Pip accepted himself in the social class he was in and how April accepted herself as a Mtis.Pip did not accept himself in the freeze aside class. He wanted to be in the fastness class just corresponding Miss Havisham is. Pip was dishonored of his family and its dismount class status. How he wasnt as fortunate as Estella who is a member of the higher(prenominal) class, especially when Estella insulted Pip saying that he is popular and how he has coarse hands. He did not have a reason to think almost his class status before this, and direct that he does, hes disturbed to thin k he tycoon be just common. This ensured Pip to not accept himself in the start out class.He didnt control any good from it. Pip matte up he needed to impress Estella. She was the one who changed Pips positioning in everything. Before meeting Estella, Pip really looked up to Joe, blacksmith or a gentleman, Joes class status makes no difference. It is not until later, when he learns that the world cares about class, thats when Joes status mattered to Pip. subsequently sightedness Estellas house and everything she had, he wanted more to look out front to. Pip did not accept his manners in the lower class.April is a young woman who has so many issues with her family and the great deal in her life. April eternally hid her feelings of shame from her sis Cheryl. April did not accept herself in the native class. Although she did not look native, she was sometimes ashamed that her sister Cheryl looked more native than she did. in that location were two different groups of child ren that went to the park. One group was brown-skinned children who looked like Cheryl in close ways. They were dirty-looking and they dressed in real raggedy cloths. I didnt care to tactical maneuver with them at all. The other group was fair-skinned and I envied them especially the girls with blonde pilus and blue eyes. They seemed so clean and fresh. Some of them were freckled unless they didnt seem to mind. To me, I imagined they were very rich and pop offd in big, beautiful houses. I wondered what their stops were like and I wished we could toy with them. But they didnt care to play with Cheryl and me.They just called us names and bullied us. (Pg. 6) Since April was young, she evermore wanted to be with the people who were fair-skinned. She didnt like seeing her sister cosmos called names especially, when they had to live with the DeRosiers. Half breeds were all that was said in that house. I heard you fractional breeds were dirty but now I can see that its true. (Un whapn () At one point, April hated being Mtis. She felt that being Mtis changed her life because when you think of Mtis, you think of living off the streets and bums on Main Street. She wasnt any of these and she didnt want to be labelled as them. She was not happy being the person she knew she was. April did not accept her life in the native class.Pip changed his social class by going off to school to become a gentleman. He was lucky to have a benefactor. Ive put apart money, unaccompanied for you to spend. When I was a hired-out shepherd in a solitary hut, not seeing no faces but faces of sheep till I half-forgot wot mens and womens faces wos like, I see yourn. . . . I see you there a many times plain as ever I see you on them misty marshes. Lord strike me dead I says severally time-and I goes out in the open air to say it to a lower place the open heavens-but wot, if I blend ins liberty and money, Ill make that male child a gentleman And I done it. (pg. 340) Magwitch reveal s himself as Pips secret benefactor and how he got all his wealth. This quote changed Pips idealistic view of wealth and social class by forcing him to attract that his own status as a gentleman is owed to the loyalty of a lower-class criminal.Year afterwards year, he moved further forth from Joe and his lower class. Pip, dear old chap, life is made of ever so many partings welded together, as I may say, and one mans a blacksmith, and ones a whitesmith, and ones a goldsmith, and ones a coppersmith. Divisions among such must come, and must be met as they come. (pg. 236) Joe comes with a smart and content attitude toward the changes in Pips social class that have driven them apart, and he shows his faithfulness and loyalty by blaming the division not on Pip but on the unchangeable nature of the human condition. Pip as a gentleman makes a lot of money and as he gets wealthy, he forgets his family and the people that are meaning(a) to him. In other words, he worries about trying to impress people, rather than being moral.April Raintree changed her identity of a native by marrying a rich white man named Bob Radcliff. She always wanted to be rich and forget about her heritage. She moved away from Winnipeg to Toronto. She tried running away from the life she did not want, to try to live a life she wanted. You think I dont know why you married Bob? It was to get away from me, thats why. Ill be you wished you were an only child. I bet you wished I was dead. (pg. 155) It was almost like she did not want Cheryl in her life at all. You never love that man. You love his money. You figured you were going to be Miss High Society. (pg. 158) April did not love Bob Radcliff she only married him for his money.Pip learns from his mistakes growing up. After realizing what kind of person he has become, and how he has treated his loved ones, he felt he was better off being in the lower class. Pip realized that wealth and class are less significant than affection, loyalty, and inner worth. When he is finally able to understand that, besides the value in which he holds Estella, someones social status is not what so ever connected to that someones character. Bentley Drummle is a figure to this because even though he is a minor character, he gave an important message. Drummle is an upper class member. He gave Pip proof that social class has no connection to attitude, personality or moral worth. Drummles blackball example helps Pip to see the inner worth of characters such as Magwitch and Joe, and Pip eventually scraped his immature fantasies about wealth and class. Everything changes for Pip after he learns the class status of his benefactor because he realized that Magwitch, a kind-hearted man who was never able to come out of the status into which he was born but in the end he was able to get wealthy.April realized that she wasnt happy with Bob, so they got a divorce. From that divorce, she received a good amount of money. She immediately went back ho me to her sister, but things were not good between Cheryl and April. After Cheryl committed suicide, April found her diaries and read them. She finally realized what Cheryl has gone through while April wasnt in her life and what she thought of everything especially what she thought of April. April accepted being Mtis then(prenominal) and there. Like her sister, she is proud to be Mtis. Since she loved Cheryl, she was glad that a part of Cheryl was alive in her son, Henry Liberty. All life dies to spend a penny new life. (pg. 184) It was tragic that it had taken Cheryls death to bring April to accept her identity but she would strive for a better tomorrow now. For her sister and her son, her parents and her people.In conclusion, Pip accepted himself in the social class that he used to be in. Even though he remained in the higher class, Pip realized that he still cared for his loved ones in the lower class. For April, she accepted herself in the social class she was born in. Even th ough Cheryls life had to be taken away before April realized how important her heritage was. Pip carried a snobby attitude for a great portion of his life. He treated the people he loved without realization of how he wasnt respectful towards them.April had tried hiding, she had attempted to be someone shes not, she had tried being with someone she didnt love, and she had likewise undertook to blocking her own sister out of her life. No matter what April did, she couldnt get away from what she really was inside. She was born Mtis. She just didnt feel proud of it nor did she want to be Mtis. Pip and April both had issues with the people in their lives and they both found their true identities from being ashamed of their social class to peace with their lives.

The links between domestic violence and homelessness and the extent to which help is available by victims

IntroductionThis topic explores the relationship between statelessness and house servant strength. Additionally, the paper examines the avail fitted style of assistant which whoremonger be accessed by victims of house servantated help delirium. While municipal rage against men, children, the elderly and homo sexuals has been well documented, the most honey oil sort of interior(prenominal) violence is the offense of women by men (Womenstate.org 2013 online). Women of a wide range of ages, relationship types and accessible, cultural and economic backgrounds argon stirred by domestic violence. The prevalent assumption is that domestic violence against women happens in the main in working class households and is strongly correlated with alcoholism and poverty, and this is to some(a) extent borne out by research (Hague and Malos, 1993). Studies discombobulate found open connections between statelessness and women who put up undergone traumatic experiences such as n eglect, abandonment and sexual abuse (Crisis 2006). Homelessness and transience for women and children is a common feature of the stories of umpteen women who stand escaped domestic violence. A high priority for women who have left over(p) abusive relationships is to secure income and accommodate. However, if they argon under the age of 16, they atomic come in 18 futile to avail of temporal adaptation or other services for the homeless person. hotshot mothers also face challenges. Be father they lack childc atomic number 18, they ar otiose to seek trading (Miller, 1990).The following sections look scratch at the ways in which homelessness and domestic violence atomic number 18 connected, and then look at the ways in which t determination can be leave aloned.Connections between homelessness and domestic violenceThe 1977 portrayal S1-1, S20 defines a person as homeless if on that point is no accommodation which he and anyone who normally lives with him as a member of his family, or if it is presumable accommodation that can non secure entry to it, either because of violence or real threat of violence from someone else residing there. There argon several reasons that a womanhood might become homeless. These include a failure of familial relationships, a request to leave, un example, marital disputes, eviction, and illness (Watson & Austerberry, 1996). Because women move to have lower incomes than men, they ar more in all likelihood to be susceptible to a number of problems associated with poverty, including homelessness. Women who separate from their teammates matter chances relocating to substandard ho use, or world left without trapping at all. Indeed, not all households considered to be homeless are entitled to accommodation. any(prenominal) governing consider homelessness due to domestic violence to be intentional homelessness (Watson & Austrereberry, 1996).Women who are victims of domestic abuse, sexual abuse or other tr aumas subsequently often find themselves victims of homelessness because they are often considered by topical anaesthetic authorities to be insufficiently vulnerable (as be by homelessness legislations) to qualify for priority needs. This is less common for single mothers, but without a child in the household it is very grueling for a woman to be deemed vulnerable enough for temporary housing.It is clear that women are confronted with the double challenge of being both domestic violence victims and also at risk of becoming poor, homeless single mothers (Baker, Cook and Norris, 2003). In order to escape domestic violence stemming from a partner, women may be hale to leave their homes. Marxist analyses suggest that women often fall into low-income brackets because they are a part of a capitalist, patriarchal society that leads to a gender-based discrepancy of labour (M assistancement 2006). When women do achieve economic independence, their earnings tend to be significantly l ower than mens, this being the result of a gendered hierarchy of occupations where womens typical occupations are concentrated at lower levels of the line of reasoning market, and with women making up the majority of those in part-time patronages. Because women are forced to rely economically on men, their issues with domestic violence and abuse are exacerbated. Thus, a significant number of women remain ignorant of any assistance thats potentially available, and consequently the issue of repeat homelessness is steady a concern. An important matter to consider is the lack of women-only housing. everyplaceall, the issue remains that homeless women are not accessing the support and help they need (Reeve, Casey, and Gouldie, 2006). Despite the go along in past decades in policy and legislation regarding homelessness, homeless women still face daunting challenges. While improved legislation and policy exist, womens broader circumstances, requirements and vulnerabilities are not t aken into consideration by local anesthetic authorities. This means that they are often denied the assistance necessary to access accommodation (Reeve, Casey and Gouldie, 2006). In some cases, women who are experiencing marital violence physical or psychic are asked to return to their homes and rely on legal processes to remove their abuser from the home (Womens National Commission, 1983), which is clearly unsatisfactory as it places them at risk of throw out abuse. Therefore, women who are unable to independently access the fiscal or social resources necessary to enter the housing market may be forced to live with domestic and family violence simply because of lack of alternatives (Chung, et al 2000). At the same time, if they feel unable to continue active in the home, they are likely to face total homelessness. Women at risk often contact their local potency for assistance. Local authorities may have a duty to provide shelter (Shelter 2013), and must be aware of any loca l connections a woman may have in relocation areas, due to the potential threat of violence from those local connections. However, in practice there seems to be many shortfalls in the furnish of care by local authorities. In one survey, the majority of women who said they had approached local authorities for homelessness assistance report extremely negative experiences (Hague and Malos 1993). Some mentioned being turned away at the door, while others claimed to have been reject from making a formal application for assistance. The women reported the local authority staff they dealt with had preconceived notions of who was deserving of assistance and who was not (Hague and Malos, 1993). Of those surveyed, more than three had never approached the local authorities for homelessness assistance. Of the women who did seek assistance, less than one trine were given priority need status, and 28% were determined to be homeless by intention (Reeve, Casey and Goudie, 2006). Where women do r eceive assistance, this is frequently less than adequate. For example, women are often given temporary accommodation in hostels, bed and breakfasts or snobbish housing. internal violence from husbands or male partners is typically united to marital or partnership difficulties, for example diffe employ expectations. If a woman is forced to leave her home due to partner violence, her difficulties may be exacerbated because in qualifying her partner she may also be leaving her financial security. Additionally, homelessness legislation has recently been re inexorableed in order to hold back it from being used as an access point for permanent housing. The loss of a home is in itself an additional traumatic element which adds to the complicated problems of domestic or relationship violence. Women who leave their homes to escape domestic violence may also face the challenge of needing to find a job that pays a vitality wage, and this difficulty may be compounded by the fact that wo men in this situation often have only employment experience. It has been reported that women who have been exposed to domestic violence are national to poverty and unemployment (Byrne et al., 1999).The diminished amount of low-cost housing ancestry leads to further challenges in attaining permanent housing. The amount of housing constructed by London councils and housing associations has decreased significantly from 21,147 in 1978 to 2,490 in 1996 (Reeve, Casey and Goudie, 2006). Therefore, though local authorities are required to find new housing for a spacious number of people, they have to do so with a shrinking stock of desirable housing. In one survey of homeless persons, 14% of respondents reported leaving their most recent home due to domestic violence making it the second highest cause of homelessness. When this question is restricted to just women, the number rises to 20%. These people all named their abusers as someone they knew, including family members, partners and local drug dealers. In the 41-50 year old age bracket, 40% of women cited domestic violence as the main cause of their homelessness, identifying it as the number one cause of homelessness for this age group (Reeve, Casey and Goudie, 2006).What assistance are victims of domestic violence able to seek?A refuge acts as a safety make for domestic violence victims in the immediate aftermath of leaving the domestic home. Refuges typically provide short-term accommodation, legal help, support groups and childrens scheduling (Baker, Cook and Norris, 2003). They offer an urgently needed safe space for do by women and their children, and work to help women regain control of their knowledge lives. Thus, refuges meet the capital requirement of women fleeing domestic violence safe emergency shelter. More well-equipped refuges are also able to offer facilities for childcare and creative play. The womens aid movement has been instrumental in making refuges available to homeless women. Refug es have become a boon for women fleeing domestic violence, but it is still difficult for single women without children to gain access or temporary accommodation (Watson and Austerberry, 1996). Women who are forced to remain in the refuge for a long level of time experience stress and anxiety brought on by living in a public, crowded space. Residents must share rooms and amenities, which can lead to struggles. This is an increasing problem, as women currently housed in temporary refuges are facing ever-longer waits for permanent housing to become available (Ozga, 2005). Additionally, the fairly strict rules that exist in some refuges can deter some women from using them, and some refuges fail to meet the needs of some groups of women, including women with disabilities, young women and women with mental health disabilities (Chung et al, 2000). In 1988 the British government decided that the need for housing should be met by housing associations and local authorities should become e nablers and regulators. That is, local housing authorities should become a residual welfare sector. The 1988 admit Act therefore visualised housing associations taking over the image of provider of social housing instead of local authorities. The statutory obligations to provide shelter and permanent housing to homeless people still chip in to housing authorities (Charles 1994). Additionally, housing associations are increasingly involved in the provision of accommodation, though local authorities are still the first point of contact in terms of rehousing for women and children leaving refuges. The problem is exacerbated because there is a shortfall in both refuge accommodation and temporary or permanent accommodation for women escaping domestic violence. Women and children typically stay in refuges for three months or even longer. Previous studies had showed that many of these women leaving refuges are permanently rehoused, however many others return home, either to their abusiv e partner or with an exclusion order (Chung et al, 2000). The other option is the private lease sector but this is usually not a realistic one. For many women is not an option to rent privately because private landlords not own tenants who are dependent on benefits or who have children, and where landlords do take these women they often do not offer secure tenancies. In addition, the rent is very expensive and most of the women cannot afford to pay. The high costs of private housing, even with the help of housing benefit, has led to some women being unable to access suitable locations or taking houses in locations that were not suitable to their needs, such as homes which are a long distances from schools, and are not close to public transports or other facilities. Such housing arrangements are unlikely to be sustainable in the long term, and women are likely to continue seeking more suitable accommodation, therefore continuing to be unsettled (Chung et al, 2000).ConclusionDomesti c and family violence are major factors bring to womens and childrens homelessness. Women are still fleeing domestic and family violence for their own safety because the legal system cannot batten down their protection. Despite the economic and social vulnerability of many such women, they often feel they have no choice but to escape a situation where they have no power and are subject to violence and abuse. The responsibility of support networks is small for assisting women in living in relationships free of violence. It is important that housing assistance is available to women who become homeless due to domestic or familial violence. Providing women and children with affordable and safe housing must be a priority, or assistance must be given to help find steady, affordable and appropriate accommodation within a short period of time. Over the long-term, it is important to expand the amount of affordable and suitable housing available, guarantee satisfactory incomes, and offer t he essential support services for current and future(a) needs of all homeless persons. It would also be advisable for domestic violence and practice guidelines to encompass policy commitments for women who have traditionally been deemed not vulnerable enough and denied rehousing assistance. These women include those without children, those who experience domestic violence stemming from outside(a) of their homes, those who have disabilities, and those who lack meaningful local connections. The heterogeneity of womens experiences of domestic violence cannot be underestimated, and gives a clear indication of the need for women to be empowered to make real choices about what strategies they wish to take to ending the violence in their lives.ReferencesBaker,C, Cook, S, and Norris, F, 2003, Domestic violence and housing problems A contextual Analysis of Womens Help-Seeking, Received Informal Support, and Formal System Response, online http//socialsciences.people.hawaii.edu/publications_ lib/domestic%20violence%20and%20housing.pdf accessed 02/11/13Charles, N, 1994, Domestic Violence, Homelessness and Housing the Response of Housing Providers in Wales, Critical Social Policy, vol.14, no.2 (41), p.36-52.Chung, D, et al, 2000, Home Safe Home, The link between domestic and family violence and womens homelessness, Australia, Pirion Pty Limited.Crisis (2006) Homeless Women, Crisis, London.Hague, G, Malos, E, 1993, Domestic violence Action For Change, Cheltenham, impudent Clarion Press.Maidment, M R (2006) Doing Time on the Outside Deconstructing the sympathetic Community, Canada, University of Toronto Press.Miller, M, 1990, Bed and Breakfast Women and Homelessness Today, London, Cox and Wyman.Ozga, J, 2005, Domestic abuse and Homelessness legislation, http//www.scottishwomensaid.org.uk/sites/default/files/SWA_Domestic_abuse_and_homelessness_legislation.pdf, accessed 03/12/13Reeve, K, Casey, R, Goudi, R, 2006, Homeless Women Still being failed yet striving to survive. ht tp//www.crisis.org.uk/publications-search.php?fullitem=182 accessed 30/11/13.Shelter (2013) Homelessness law and domestic violence, online (cited 21st declination 2013) available fromhttp//shop.shelter.org.uk/training/homelessness-law-domestic-violence.htmlWatson, S, Austerberry, 1996, Housing and homelessness A feminist Perspective, London, Routlege & Kegan Paul.Womensaid.org (2013) Statistics About Domestic Violence, online (cited 21st

Summary of President Lyndon

Lyndon B. Johnson attempted to mold his listeners to act in golf-club to guarantee match vote rights for entirely Americans by using the phrase the American Promise. He began his peech in a way that suggests his message would surpass the period constraint facing the state. The current constraint, he felt, was a turning point in mans unending seem for freedom and equal rights. It is part of the American Promise, which is to guarantee the freedom and compare of every man in America.Johnson suggested throughout his speech that denying equal rights to African Americans, illustrated by the violence in Selma, AL, signify a threat to the set our kingdom. To keep African Americans from enjoying the freedom and equality guaranteed by the Declaration of emancipation and the American Revolution would break our nations promise, Johnson mentions throughout his speech. In short, the President held the speech of democratic freedom and equality to help guarantee equal voting rights to African Americans.Johnson also concludes that the issue confronting the county was of historic significance. He suggested that although the United States unplowed African Americans from enjoying the benefits of freedom and equality for many years, the nation had not low-pitched its promiseyet however destiny had crossed the nations ath at this involve time, for the decision to be made, keep the promise or break it. The electric chair stresses that such a moment came rarely in any time. Therefore, the nation must take hold of the opportunity.His speech helped deflate Southern ohmic resistance to equal voting rights by making racial discrimination at voting booth seem fundamentally un-American. By doing this Johnson directly amaze supporters of segregation on the losing side of an issue of principle. No one could argue persuasively that voter discrimination was in line with American values. prohibited of this peech President Johnson crafted a compelling Justification for imme diate passage of a strong federal voting rights law.His speech became the framework for public and congressional deliberations. At a time ot urgency and chaos, his speech to congress and to the nation provided focus and clarity on a very important and cranky issue of that time. President Johnsons speech is remarkable because it made the idea of equal voting rights meaningful and compelling through shared interests, motives, and intentions in order to secure the passage of one of the most important civil rights laws for the country.

Capital Punishment Should Be Abolished

Points to remember earlier you recruit in this disuccsion * Assume, you angiotensin converting enzyme of the member of a real group discussion. * Take the initiative to participate and contri mutee your thoughts. * Express your positive attitude towards providing the solution. In my opinion kinda of banning Capital penalisation, frequency of seat of g all every shoesnment penalisation should be brought to minimum. It should be relentlessly applied in theatrical role of Rape & dispatch ( kettle of fish murder) be produce nada has constituten him in good sanctify to destroy roundbodys emotional domain and they should fear e actually at one timea twenty-four hourss and consequently that this law-breaking pull up s confines non be tolerate rapist and murderers. but non for robbery or different(a) offset level disgust because you ignore earn your wealth again 10-15 year of imprisonment bequeath bug outpouring him heavy lesson. An kernel f or an eye a as wellth for a similarlyth which we all(prenominal) today k at a timen as majuscule penalisation. I look at it should non be banned. Though this throw off water of penalization is inhuman and ferine, at that place is no other alternative but to enforce it. Just as virtuoso removes a rotten apple to save the basket bountiful of apples, as well we moldiness get exempt of the unwanted elements so that we drive out conduct the nine. Hi, I theorise pileus penalisation should non be banned. Criminals be all their government agency to go beyond the unexpected mark. Once they argon being left or being ignored at, they whitethorn cause a massive genocide. Second thing is that they get out non capture both fear for each penalty which whitethorn contract to increase in annoyance in the society and willing hinder in social harmony and social peace. harmonize to me heavy(p) penalization should non be banned. Criminals theorize that they will be threw into the prison if they commit any iniquity. at that place is no dislocate in their call uping because the rules of the INDIAN CONSTITUTION had do the a corresponding that. They dont bother well-nigh jail although the penalisation time is either 7 years or 14 years because jails argon like their vacation spots. ( pattern in the case of kasab). This is one of the reason for change magnitude in villainy rate. But If India had followed the concept of capital punishment there would be no Mumbai attacks, no murders, no kidnappings. The fear of demolition (because of capital punishment) should tickle pink the venomouss for thinking of crime. Then India absolutely clear be peaceful country. According to me capital punishment should be attached to evermorey poisonous who has act a crime. By giving capital punishment to ein truth woeful and it be bob ups a lesson for them and they possibly think about that what they argon doing. For this govt has to take grim actions and make our India crime-less country. If it is abolished hence our society will in trouble, today, non so more but still criminals take in fear of capital punishment if its take conserve going by GOVT the the courage will increase in criminals and they will do crime fearless.So my suggestion when any body do crime like murder, muck up, robbery then we essential give capital punishment worryaticly such kind of slew because nobody take a crap rights for fine-tuneing other sight. I think capital punishment should non be banned. As said by many an(prenominal) most other(prenominal)(prenominal) soulfulnesss who ar we to take the carriage of others, we sum civilisation where this law of capital punishment has non come from sky but majority of our country men and women voted for capital punishment to prevail and if you atomic routine 18 living in this country you argon accepting the law and in law capital punishment too c omes. Capital punishment should not be abolished kinda our government should think about it n emphasize on it. Capital Punishment should be abandoned to those who take over with with(p) heinous crimes like murder. There must be fear in the mind of peck then simply we clear get healthy atmosphere to live. It will slim down the crime rate in the countries otherwise we will wear our newspaper full of crimes in the after behavior as we prevail now. So to get rid of these things I think Capital punishment should not be abolished. I appreciate opinions coming from different plurality but capital punishment is not punishment at all, it is retaliate in its good form as hatful think. Punishment is, no matter how unimaginable the crime is or whether we are bound by sentiments or not is scientifically a procedure to correct mind of CRIMINAL. Whether a person hideed thousands or not is unrelated as Punishment talks about field and not past, if we talk about past dont call it PU NISHMENT it is r even upge simply Secondly law is going thousands of years pricker when holiness and psychology are going into future.People think to a great extent massive crimes a person commits the more than punishment he deserves because we burnnot bear the end results at all, true but the feature is that society uses two opposites goodish and BAD. GOOD should be victorious over BAD, but terrible crimes like mass murders, misdemeanours, burning flock, children etc. Are connected by mentally unhinged people. No normal person has desire or interest or energy or even thought will ever come, so we are biologically safe first People like Teresa, savior hold inherent traits that make them peaceful. Ok they cleverness assimilate witting will but they did not use it because they take a expression not.On other go across criminals need to use additional will and c refere their mind from instincts and urges and this is not called REAL GREAT psychopaths are innate(p) with distorted mind, is it their fault? They have no sensation called have sex. Love comes from brain. If any one has doubt they send a modality alone observe whether emotions are frenziede with hands or come from within us without effort. If so a person who rumpnot love domain has fault in nervous transcription. If a person takes anesthetic will he get pain? Still the person may go antecedent wide awake with no pain in part injected with anesthetic.On alike(p) lines criminals know what they are doing (barring a somewhat who are completely mad and insane and do not know reality) but cannot relish love or empathy comely like anesthetic REMOVES PAIN. So one minute of arc assume we are not innate(p) with this EMOTION or this emotion is minimal? one and only(a) can tell their own answers? Well, capital punishment in India is given in the rarest of rare cases. This includes. Raging war against the nation, murder abetting the suicide of a child or insane person and likewise . If this is so then wherefore delay in the case of Ajmal Kasab and Afjal guru? Hadnt they have done this offense?They came, butchered our democracy, pl infraed Indian lives and mystically send a position across to our netas and babus and apparently to us well iterate this. What can you do? Dont you think this is a derogatory to our democracy, to our so-called cultured society and to our crippled law. I think trialing these bozos is a all a waste of our money and time. Just hang these guys till goal because these lunatics dont have respect to the lives of necessitouss. So, why to have forbearance on them. I vehemently appealingness to our netas and babus not to test our forbearance and provide them capital punishment.I admit there should not be any trial to these guys, upright horrificctly hang them, and I also appeal to our law-makers to transport the case of rape in this jurisdiction. Hi, m Sukanta. I have already written my view here long day back. But I think so me people didnt get my come out or didnt read my opinion . People like Anuradha, commented on thirty-first March (plz dont take it in a negative modal cling to) , I think are not practical and live in a illusion ideal world, where (they think) if you forbid a person not to do crime, just listens to you and s altitude doing crime. Ok.To you all such persons, I am lay some questions again. Please answer straightly, not in a round about way and without repeating idealistic writings like we should get the better of. , then whats the difference among them and the judges etc. My questions are- 1 ) Tell me just one way to change the minds of people like Kasav, Daud Ibrahim, Afjal Guru and so on or how can you kill the crime within them ? 2 ) How can you be sure enough that they wont do any crime again ? 3 ) How can you be sure that farther no plane will be hijacked demanding their pocket ? ) Who will bear the bell of super expensive foods and security ( as Kasav is getting right n ow )? 5 ) Can you think of any other punishment if your incur/ mother/brother/sister or your boy wiz/ fille / wife/husband will die in such a horrific incident ? If so, then plz mention the punishment you would like to give them . Thank you. Hey people, in India where I live (Chandigarh) crime rate is change magnitude by the clock, and I believe there might be come to fall of capital punishments, well its not like that punishment is given when the accused are caught and certifyd misdeedy.Firstly, getting through this phase is very difficult, and even if the accused is punished of Daffa 302 the hanging is not made. There has not been a single hanging since 2004 in India. Well, with this attitude I go steady the criminals would not be afraid of the governance. Well, Capital punishments is virtually abolished . As per my perception, capital punishment is merely on papers in India right now, as it is clear from the fact that Indian addresss have execrationd near abo ut 29 decease reprobate in last decade out of which only one person has been executed till date and the remaining are just on papers.In a recent judgement given by Session judge, kathua (j&k) in which six out of seven accused were grant finish penalty (seventh one has already expired) but as is the tally prevalling in india, this judgment of blameion is also just on paper, to execute them is too hard on the part of concerned authority. Apart from that afzal guru has been awarded capital punishment since 2006. But till date there is no execution of that reprove because execution of afzal guru is now only a question of executing a crimnal, but a senstive poltical riposte.Various neferous poltical beaurecrates in India and especially in kashmir are earning there bread on this vary issue ana centre is also alive(predicate) of the fact that if afzal guru is hanged during there tenure, there poltical graph would come down in kashmir by a fair add up. So we can say that if person who have been granted remnant sentence are not hanged and if the sentence awarded to them is just on paper, then what is the fun of awarding this sentence, its break dance that it should be banned now. Dear friends, I believe that for the sake of saving hardly a(prenominal) criminals we cannot let hundreds and thousands of innocent people to die. yet if we have to take strict action against them, even if it is a capital punishment we shold come forward and support it. We have seen that due to the lack of proper and strict actions, thousands of innocent people are raped and murdered every year and the criminals passing freely without any fear of getting punishment. As one of my friend took the example of saudi Arabia, We can also make India a safer and better place to live with the imposition of capital punishment. Capital punishment must not be removed because i think it is the right way to give lesson to other criminals that his crime may lead him to death many peoples had written the sayings kill the crime not the criminals but they had not mentioned the way to do that. Shall we start appointing MAHATMA BUDHH and swami vivekanand instead of police? boob 4 tackiness is equalise here. i want to ask the people ask for mercy that if a convict kills your nearly loving one then also u will ask the honorable judge for generateing mercy to him And for them i want that they must watch the movie A WEDNESDAY. From my perspective, capital punishment should not be abolished as it will in spades help us to force a sense of fear in the minds of criminals. Kill crimes not criminals is a marvelous proposal but those allow for this theory should clarify how it can be put into practice. In dictate to save the innocent people from being punished, I strongly smell out that, all loopholes in the judicial system should be closed. Only capital punishment awarded to hard-core criminals can set an example for other like minded persons and help the polity to bring down the whopping image of ever increasing criminal deeds.One more point, those liberal minds, who shed crying for the criminals must taken into account the pathetic state of the dupes. Moreover, countries with stringent criminal and judicial systems perpetually display a decreasing trend in such heinous acts as murder and theft. Take the example of Saudi Arabia where Islamic code of law is strictly implemented, the number of such enigmatical crimes are very low there. So capital punishment should be there in the larger interest of the country at least as a necessary evil. I do not think that capital punishment is the only solution to fall down crime in the society.Already there are many cases are still pending and our tribunal and government is sleeping. Todays in lakhs ac make up cases are pending and the accused are moving freely without any problem. In my view govt should make a strict rules against accused and finalised their case only in six months and give a hard punishment without capital punishment. Hi everyone. I totally maintain that capital punishment should be given, if a person have committed any heinous crime, but before that a vapourish investigation should be done.Today most of the time main culprits (usually people with considerable amount of money) uses poor as their weapon and commit heinous crimes and cannot ever get caught, because they bribe everybody and every system, and not only this they bring out false proofs against that poor guy and thus that poor fellow becomes victim. And our administration give punishment to that poor as it depends on proofs, doesnt matter tho false it may be. I just want to ask why the poor became victim, just because he was poor or he has just trusted somebody? Capital punishment should be given to that criminal who has shadowed himself and used a poor person as his weapon.Indeed he should be hanged. I agree with the statement we should kill crime not criminals. But how can the crime be reduced without this type of punishment. It is not possible to create an awareness so that the criminals move away from the crime. We can take the example of the terrorist itself. Providing awareness doesnt seems to create any alteration in their minds. So in my opinion,only way would be the capital punishment. Punishment should be meant to leave a message of fear in the hearts of whoever essay to commit a brutal crime. This fear can obviously bar them doing brutal crimes.As my friend said earlier,over 30 countries have abolished capital punishment and do not have any increase in crime. But at the same time it have not shown any decrease in rate. Whereas in countries having strict capital punishment have low crime rates. If regarding the punishment of innocent,its up to judiciary. They have been shown faulty in take care of judiciary. Thats why they are been given punishment like dat So in my opinion,capital punishment should not be abolished Hi everyone. A very good line sai d by Priya We should kill crimes, not criminals. Im agree with this line.It is the best way if we are able to kill crimes without violent death criminals. This could be possible only when there is stringent law and people are abide by the laws. But if there is need to kill criminals to reduce crime then its also quite fair picking. We should follow Tit for Tat Policy. Those who have committed heinous crimes like murder, rape and the politicians who have cheated our country and the people should be given capital punishment immediately. These types of person doesnt deserve to get a place in our society. I think for some crime capital punishment should be there.In India, people are not respecting laws any more. Whether he is a rich guy or poor. They some how have started believing that they will escape from blazon of law. If we take the case of Jessica or Priyadarshini Matto, in both cases judgement took so many years by that time criminals were roaming freely in the society. Wha t is warrant that these people will not engage in any other crime? In US capital punishment is allowed and people over there are more disciplined just because the laws are so stringent. In India also present day situation is so alarming that strictness is need of the hour. . Every human vll enjoy the freedom at the most of all side provided to him until n unless there are no strict rules. . I m completely satisfied with kapil you can not let criminals to be in a state of fearless after commiting crime. Capital punishment should not be banned. One who is guilty shud be punished and if his/her crime goes beyond limit then he/she is meritable of capital punishment. By doing so we can reduce crime rates. These are rakshax and capital punishment is there vadh. According to me, capital punishment should not be abolished. here is no reason to save the life of such a person who is a cause of misery and fear in society. capital punishments are not meant for gauzy crimes. If the cri me committed is not intense they are punished in terms of fine and imprisonment. if they are to improve themselves, they would definitely do that by this. if people go to cessation of murdering or other criminal activities, they are definitely becoming uncivilized and has no fear of law. such a criminal is sure to do many more harms to society and the nation as a whole. No nation need such criminals and so this world is not a place for them. We should kill crime and not criminals I agree.. But how can we kill crime in our society? It is possible only by killing the culprits.. A punishment should serve as a shudder example for others thus preventing them from doing anything unfair.. I strongly believe that India should become a more disciplined country like Singapore where a small mistake like spitting in the roadside can lead to grave fines.. In short,our Government should take steps to take stringent measures towards anything We should kill crime and not criminals I agree.. But how can we kill crime in our society?It is possible only by killing the culprits.. A punishment should serve as a shuddering example for others thus preventing them from doing anything unfair.. I strongly believe that India should become a more disciplined country like Singapore where a small mistake like spitting in the roadside can lead to heavy fines.. In short,our Government should take steps to take stringent measures towards anything unfair,whoever be the culprit,be it an ordinary person or one of our much respected ministers.. advance our country. only if the punishments are severe, crimes will get reduced. lse, we could queue no(prenominal) other way to protect ourself from crimes . . . so i am strongly agree with that capital punishments are to be booned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Have a good day to All , This is Vimal. According to my view capital punishment is the only solution to reduce the crime rates. Because i have an evidence not only me all of us kne w this. Countries like Dubai Saudi Arabhiya the crime rates are very less only because of severe punishments , and capital punishments for most of the crimes. killing the criminals only kills the crime. unless crime will not be killed. To have a healthy country we should reduce the crime. o reduce crime capital punishment should be needed Criminals have no right to take aways mortals smile n if they are guilty of affecting psyches life then they are worthy to go through such alike pain. May be the fear of going through the same might stop them doing something brutal. Relieving them from capital punishment is alleviating them for going for wrong doings. Crime is everywhere. In our neighborhood, in the neighboring state, wherever we look, we find criminals and crime. Criminals have become a part of our daily lives. Does this mean we let them be the darkness of our society?No, definitely not. Eliminating crime and criminals is our duty, and we cannot ignore it. Getting the rightl y accused to a just punishment is very important. I do not direction death penalty for everybody. I support death penalty because of some(prenominal) reasons. Firstly, I believe that death penalty serves as a balk and helps in reducing crime. Secondly, it is true that death penalty is irreversible, but it is hard to kill a wrongly convicted person due to the several chances given to the convicted to prove his innocence. Thirdly, death penalty assures safety of the society by eliminating these criminals.Deterrence means to punish somebody as an example and to create fear in other people for the punishment. Death penalty is one of those extreme punishments that would create fear in the mind of any sane person. Capital punishment should be abolished Critics of capital punishment put forward several arguments. 1. The occupation of the death penalty is so arbitrary that it violates the Eighth Amendments prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. judge Harry Blackmun claims th ere is an irreconcilable conflict between two fates in capital sentencing.On the one hand, the Eighth Amendment demands that sentencing readiness in capital cases be structured according to fixed, objective standards to turn down whim and difference. On the other hand, there is a humanitarian askment that sentencing discretion be flexible enough to permit sentencers to personalize justice by taking mitigating circumstances into account that might justify a sentence less than death. 2. The death penalty discriminates against racial minorities and the poor. Statistics show that the death penalty is administered in a selective and racially discriminatory manner. 3. The eath penalty doesnt discourage crime. 4. The death penalty costs taxpayers more than life imprisonment. 5. The inevitability of factual, legal, and incorrupt errors results in a system that must wrongly kill some innocent defendants. 6. Public support for the death penalty diminishes substantially when the eve ryday is fully informed about the penalty, the alternative of life imprisonment without parole, and the consequences of the death penalty. Capital punishment should not be abolished Proponents of the death penalty make arguments centering around the justifications of fairness, retribution, deterrence, economy, and popularity. . The death penalty isnt arbitrary. In Gregg v. Georgia (1976), the unequivocal Court ruled that the death penalty isnt cruel and unusual punishment and that a two-part proceeding one for determining innocence or guilt and one for determining the sentence is constitutional. Any conflicts between eliminating arbitrariness and allowing sentencers to individualize justice can be resolved, according to Justice Scalia, by dispensing with the requirement that sentencers consider an array of mitigating circumstances. . The death penalty isnt discriminatory. In McCleskey v. Kemp (1987), the Court held that statistical evidence of racial discrimination in death sente ncing cant establish a violation of the Eighth or Fourteenth Amendments. To win an appeal under the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Court requires an appellant to prove the decision makers in his or her case acted with intent to discriminate. 3. Executions deter manque criminals from committing crimes. 4.It is cheaper for the government to kill murderers than to keep them in prison for the duration of their lives. 5. The few mistakes that are made in carrying out the death penalty are offset by its crime prevention and economic benefits. 6. Polls show the vast majority of Americans favor the death penalty for murderers. 7. Society has a moral right to punish the most violent criminals by taking their lives. whatsoever violent criminals are vile, wicked persons who deserve to die. Evaluating the debate over capital punishmentA substantial body of empirical studies shows that the administration of capital punishment is arbitrary, that the costs of trials and multiple appeals make the death penalty more expensive than housing an offender in prison for life, that the death penalty does not deter violent crime, and that during the twentieth century more than 400 people were erroneously convicted in capital cases. Although the Supreme Court denied the racial discrimination argument in McCleskey v. Kemp, statistical evidence supports the claim that the burden of capital punishment falls upon the poor and the underprivileged.Studies show that a disproportionate number of individuals sentenced to death are members of minority groups and that nearly all individuals on death row are indigents. The argument that the death penalty should be hold because the majority of the people in the United States want it, equates the numbers in support of a position with the correctness of it. The rightness or inappropriateness of the death penalty logically is neither helped nor hindered by the numbers in support. Opinions dont logically equate to factual kn owledge.Deciding whether or not society has a moral right to take the lives of murderers and other violent criminals requires a value judgment. In support of their position, proponents of the death penalty cite the Judeo-Christian custom of eye for eye, tooth for tooth. Opponents counter by emphasizing New Testament admonitions to liberate the other cheek and to love thy neighbor. In a Nutshell Yes No 1. financial costs to taxpayers of capital punishment is several quantify that of keeping soul in prison for life. 2. It is angry and violates the cruel and unusual clause in the story of Rights. . The endless appeals and required additional procedures clog our court system. 4. We as a society have to move away from the eye for an eye revenge mentality if civilization is to advance. 5. It sends the wrong message why kill people who kill people to show killing is wrong. 6. Life in prison is a worse punishment and a more in effect(p) deterrent. 7. Other countries (especially in Europe) would have a more well-situated visualise of America. 8. many jury members are reluctant to convict if it means putting someone to death. 9.The prisoners family must arrive from seeing their loved one put to death by the state, as well as going through the emotionally-draining appeals process. 10. The possibility exists that innocent men and women may be put to death. 11. mentally ill patients may be put to death. 12. It creates kindliness for the monstrous perpetrators of the crimes. 13. It practically draws top talent laywers who will work for little or no cost due to the publicity of the case and their personal beliefs against the morality of the death penalty, increasing the chances a technicality or a manipulated jury will release a guilt person. 4. It is useless in that it doesnt bring the victim back to life. 1. The death penalty gives closure to the victims families who have suffered so much. 2. It creates another form of crime deterrent. 3. Justice is better served. 4. Our justice system shows more sympathy for criminals than it does victims. 5. It provides a deterrent for prisoners already serving a life sentence. 6. DNA scrutiny and other methods of modern crime scene experience can now effectively eliminate almost all disbelief as to a persons guilt or innocence. 7.Prisoner parole or escapes can give criminals another chance to kill. 8. It contributes to the problem of overpopulation in the prison system. 9. It gives prosecutors another bargaining chip in the plea bargain process, which is essential in cutting costs in an overcrowded court system. Overview/Background The United States the Great Compromiser in the minority of nations in the world that still uses death as penalty for certain crimes. Many see the penalty as merciless and against American values. Others see it as a very important cats-paw in fighting violent pre-meditated murder.Two things have once again brought this issue to national debate. One is the release o f some highly publicized studies that show a number of innocents had been put to death. The second is the issue of terrorism and the need to punish its perpetrators. Yes ? Financial costs to taxpayers of capital punishment is several times that of keeping someone in prison for life. Most people dont fancy that carrying out one death sentence costs 2-5 times more than keeping that same criminal in prison for the rest of his life. How can this be?It has to do with the endless appeals, additional required procedures, and legal argufy that drag the process out. Its not unusual for a prisoner to be on death row for 15-20 years. Judges, attorneys, court reporters, clerks, and court facilities all require a substantial investment by the taxpayers. Do we really have the resources to waste? ? It is barbaric and violates the cruel and unusual clause in the Bill of Rights. Whether its a firing squad, electric chair, gas chamber, lethal injection, or hanging, its barbaric to allow state-sanct ioned murder before a crowd of people.We condemn people like Ahmadinejad, Qaddafi, and Kim Jong Il when they murder their own people while we take place to do the same (although our procedures for allowing it are obviously more thorough). The 8th Amendment of the U. S. ecesis prevents the use of cruel and unusual punishment. Many would interpret the death penalty as violating this restriction. ? The endless appeals and required additional procedures clog our court system. The U. S. court system goes to enormous lengths before allowing a death sentence to be carried out. All the appeals, motions, hearings, briefs, etc. onopolize much of the time of judges, attorneys, and other court employees as well as use up courtrooms & facilities. This is time & lacuna that could be used for other unresolved matters. The court system is hugely backed up. This would help move things along. ? We as a society have to move away from the eye for an eye revenge mentality if civilization is to advan ce. The eye for an eye mentality will neer solve anything. A revenge philosophy inevitably leads to an endless cycle of violence. why do you think the Israeli-Palestine conflict has been going on for 60 years?Why do you think gang violence in this country never seems to end? It is important to send a message to society that inter-group communication back at your enemy purely for revenge will always make matters worse. ? It sends the wrong message why kill people who kill people to show killing is wrong. Yes, we want to make sure there is accountability for crime and an effective deterrent in place however, the death penalty has a message of You killed one of us, so well kill you. The state is actually using a murder to punish someone who committed a murder. Does that make sense? Life in prison is a worse punishment and a more effective deterrent. For those of you who dont feel much sympathy for a murderer, keep in mind that death may be too good for them. With a death sentence, th e suffering is over in an instant. With life in prison, the pain goes on for decades. Prisoners are check to a cage and live in an internal environment of rape and violence where theyre treated as animals. And consider terrorists. Do you think theyd rather suffer the humiliation of lifelong prison or be martyred by a death sentence?What would have been a better ending for Osama bin Laden, the bullet that killed him instantly, or a life of humiliation in an American prison (or if he was put through rendition to happen more information). ? Other countries (especially in Europe) would have a more favorable image of America. Its no secret that anti-Americanism is rampant around the world. One of the reasons is Americas go on use of the death penalty. Were seen as a violent, vengeful nation for such a policy. This is pretty much the same view that Europeans had of America when we go along the practice of slavery long after it had been banned in Europe. Some jury members are reluctant to convict if it means putting someone to death. Many states require any jury members to be polled during the pre-trial examination to be sure they have the stomach to sentence someone to death before theyre allowed to serve. Even if theyre against the death penalty, they still may lie in order to get on the panel. The thought of agreeing to kill someone even influences some jury members to acquit rather than risk the death. Some prosecutors may go for a lesser charge rather than force juries into a death-or-acquit choice.Obviously, in all these situations, justice may not be served. ? The prisoners family must suffer from seeing their loved one put to death by the state, as well as going through the emotionally-draining appeals process. One victims innocent family is obviously forced to suffer from a capital murder, but by enforcing a death sentence, you force another family to suffer. Why double the suffering when we dont have to? ? The possibility exists that innocent men and wo men may be put to death. There are several documented cases where DNA testing showed that innocent people were put to death by the government.We have an imperfect justice system where poor defendants are given minimal legal attention by often lesser qualified individuals. Some would blame the court system, not that death penalty itself for the problems, but we cant risk mistakes. ? Mentally ill patients may be put to death. Many people are simply born with defects to their brain that cause them to act a certain way. No amount of drugs, schooling, rehabilitation, or positive reinforcement will change them. Is it fair that someone should be murdered just because they were unlucky enough to be born with a brain defect.Although it is technically unconstitutional to put a mentally ill patient to death, the rules can be vague, and you still need to be able to convince a judge and jury that the defendant is in fact, mentally ill. ? It creates sympathy for the monstrous perpetrators of the crimes. Criminals usually are looked down upon by society. People are disgusted by the vile, unconscionable acts they commit and feel tremendous sympathy for the victims of murder, rape, etc. However, the death penalty has a way of shifting sympathy away from the victims and to the criminals themselves.An excellent example is the execution a few years ago of former gang leader Tookie Williams. He was one of the original members of the notorious Crips gang, which has a long legacy of robbery, assault, and murder. This is a man who was convicted with overwhelming evidence of the murder of four people, some of whom he shot in the back and then laughed at the sounds they made as they died. This is a man who never even took responsibility for the crimes or apologized to the victims non ONCE These victims had kids and spouses, but instead of sympathy for them, sympathy shifted to Tookie. Candlelight vigils were held for him.Websites like savetookie. org sprang up. Protests and a media c ircus ensued trying to prevent the execution, which eventually did take place 26 years after the crime itself There are many cases like this, which make a mockery of the evil crimes these degenerates commit. ? It often draws top talent laywers who will work for little or no cost due to the publicity of the case and their personal beliefs against the morality of the death penalty, increasing the chances a technicality or a manipulated jury will release a guilt person. Top attorneys are world-class manipulators. They know how to call up facts and misdirect thinking.They know how to select juries sympathetic to their side. They know how to find obscure technicalities and use any other means necessary to get their client off without any punishment. Luckily, most criminal defendants cannot afford to absorb these top guns they must make do with a low-paid public protector or some other cheaper attorney. However, a death penalty case changes everything. First of all, a death penalty ca se almost always garners significant media attention. Lawyers want that exposure, which enhances their name recognition & reputation for potential future plantiffs and defendants.Second of all, thousands of attorneys have made their personal crusade in life the stomping out of the death penalty. Entire organizations have sprung up to fight death penalty cases, often providing all the funding for a legal defense. For an example, look no further than the Casey Anthony trial, in which a pool of top attorneys took on a high profile death penalty case and used voir dire and peremptory challenges to craft one of the stupidest juries on record, who ended up ignoring facts and special K sense or release an obviously guilty woman who killed her daughter.After the not guilty verdict was rendered, defense attorneys such as Cheney Mason went into boring speeches for the media about the evils of the death penalty. ? It is useless in that it doesnt bring the victim back to life. Perhaps the big gest reason to ban the death penalty is that it doesnt change the fact that the victim is gone and will never come back. Hate, revenge, and anger will never cure the emptiness of a lost loved one. benignity is the only way to start the healing process, and this wont happen in a revenge-focused individual. No 1. 2.The death penalty gives closure to the victims families who have suffered so much. Some family members of crime victims may take years or decades to recover from the semiconsciousness and loss of a loved one. Some may never recover. One of the things that helps hasten this recovery is to achieve some kind of closure. Life in prison just means the criminal is still around to fix the victim. A death sentence brings finality to a horrible chapter in the lives of these family members. 3. It creates another form of crime deterrent. Crime would run rampant as never before if there wasnt some way to deter people from committing the acts.Prison time is an effective deterrent, bu t with some people, more is needed. Prosecutors should have the option of using a variety of punishments in order to minimize crime. 4. Justice is better served. The most fundamental principle of justice is that the punishment should fit the crime. When someone plans and brutally murders another person, doesnt it make sense that the punishment for the perpetrator also be death? 5. Our justice system shows more sympathy for criminals than it does victims. Its time we put the emphasis of our criminal justice system back on protecting the victim rather than the accused.Remember, a person whos on death row has almost always committed crimes before this. A long line of victims have been waiting for justice. We need justice for menses and past victims. 6. It provides a deterrent for prisoners already serving a life sentence. What about people already sentenced to life in prison. Whats to stop them from murdering people constantly while in prison? What are they going to doextend their sen tences? Sure, they can take away some prison privileges, but is this enough of a deterrent to stop the killing? What about a person sentenced to life who happens to escape? Whats to stop him from killing anyone who might ry to bring him in or curb his crime spree? 7. DNA testing and other methods of modern crime scene science can now effectively eliminate almost all uncertainty as to a persons guilt or innocence. One of the biggest arguments against the death penalty is the possibility of error. Sure, we can never completely eliminate all uncertainty, but nowadays, its about as close as you can get. DNA testing is over 99 percent effective. And even if DNA testing and other such scientific methods didnt exist, the trial and appeals process is so thorough its next to impossible to convict an innocent person.Remember, a jury of 12 members must unanimously ensconce theres not even a reasonable doubt the person is guilty. The number of innocent people that might somehow be convicted is no greater than the number of innocent victims of the murderers who are set free. 8. Prisoner parole or escapes can give criminals another chance to kill. Perhaps the biggest reason to keep the death penalty is to prevent the crime from happening again. The parole system nowadays is a joke. Does it make sense to anyone outside the legal system to have multiple life sentences 20 years or other jiverish?Even if a criminal is sentenced to life without possibility of parole, he still has a chance to kill while in prison, or even worse, escape and go on a crime/murder spree. 9. It contributes to the problem of overpopulation in the prison system. Prisons across the country face the problem of too many prisoners and not enough space & resources. Each additional prisoner requires a portion of a cell, food, clothing, extra guard time, and so on. When you eliminate the death penalty as an option, it means that prisoner must be housed for life.Thus, it only adds to the problem of an overcrow ded prison system. 10. - It gives prosecutors another bargaining chip in the plea bargain process, which is essential in cutting costs in an overcrowded court system. The number of criminal cases that are plea bargained ( moment the accused admits guilt in return for a lesser sentence or some other concession) can be as high as 80 or 90 percent of cases. With the time, cost, and personnel requirements of a criminal case, there really isnt much of a choice.The vast majority of people that are arraigned are in fact guilty of the crime they are accused. Even if you believe a defendant only deserves life in prison, without the panic of a death sentence, there may be no way to get him to plead guilty and accept the sentence. If a case goes to trial, in addition to the enormous cost, you run the chance that you may lose the case, meaning a violent criminal gets off scot free. The existence of the death penalty gives prosecutors much more flexibility and power to ensure just punishments. psychiatric hospital

Chaos in Art and Literature :: Exploratory Essays Research Papers

topsy-turvyness in Art and lit Abstract The following stem deals with the expanding world of the new science of pandemonium. funny farm is unique because it can be applied to all the core sciences, and to a greater extent importantly it can be applied to subjects not considered to be science. The paper below deals with the evidence of chaos in literary productions and art, and how it functions in this world. art object many aspects of the chaos present in art and literature be different from the science of chaos, some similarities still emerged and can be seen when examined closely. chaos was found to be especially evident in the works of W.B. Yeats, tin Milton, Wallace Stevens, William Blake, Jackson Pollock, and in the works of those involved in the Futurist Movement. Chaos is a word with many applications. It has been used to describe situations that lack order, and at the same time it has been used to describe underlying mechanisms of the core sciences. interestingly enough, chaos now can be found in opposite realms of the scholarly world, most notably in art and literature. By examining the literature of William Blake, W.B. Yeats, John Milton, and Wallace Stevens, and the art of the futurist movement and of Jackson Pollock chaos can be found as can its connection to the more scientific world. The chaos found in literature is not something excessively entirely modern. In fact one of the first examples of chaos in literature according to Alaa H. Fawad was found in William Blakes poem Auguries of Innocence. The poem describes how a world can exist as a microcosm in a our world in a grain of sand and how the world Blake lives in could perhaps be a grain of sand in other world. Fawad insists that this poem sums up the idea of chaos the science that describes the cosmos at both extremes. Those extremes according to him were the largeness associated with the theory of relativity and the smallness associated with quantum natural philosophy (Faw ads Chaos on the World Wide Web). Chaos, though, has also been found in more recent works such as in the poems of William butler Yeats. This Irish poet who won the Nobel Prize in literature is known for his loyal poetry that celebrates Ireland as well as its culture and folklore. More importantly, though, Yeats was elicit in philosophy.